I
should point out that I'm not a teacher by trade though I've taught
many courses, and not a researcher. While I appreciate good research
and cite a few useful pieces, over the years I've noticed that teachers
are seldom moved by it, and that the few conditions that really matter
are so familiar as to be almost boring:
1. Skill development of any kind depends on practice.
2. Feelings and communications affect learning.
3. Students need to know where to place their effort.
4. They need increments of success and reinforcement for them.
5. They develop comprehensive knowledge by assimilating it piece by piece.
Nothing
startling there. Some ways of doing those simple things discourage
students, however, and others stimulate them by how they engage
students' energy--which typically responds quickly. You don't need a
district reorganization to know. In a few days you say, "This interests
them. They sit up and take notice and want to keep going, and they're
learning."
I've seen the ideas explained here succeed from
kindergarten through high school, and with the most difficult students
any teacher is likely to encounter. I worked for six months at the Lake
Washington Individual Progress Center with high school students who had
severe
emotional and behavioral disabilities, and conducted a school in my
home
for two years with middle and high school students who couldn’t manage
the public system. I’ve shared the methods with teachers in Washington,
Minnesota, New Mexico, and Alaska, observing their progress and
learning
with them, and applied the ideas to an acrimonious fourth grade class
in
Seattle that’s described in detail in Chapter 9. If this sample is too
small to
warrant changing your own class or school, note the distinction I
suggest
above. In week you can test the ideas yourself with no fi nancial outlay, no
reorganization, no new curriculum, and no one looking over your shoulder.
Use the methods with what you already teach, and watch students learn
and feel better.
----------------------------------------
A clue about how learning energy is aroused came to me in the early
1990s.
On a Saturday afternoon when my son was in middle school, I watched
him and his friends dash about a rain-soaked fi eld in a soccer game. They
were motivated, yet almost all were indifferent students. I could imagine
them walking into their respective classrooms through an invisible force
field that zapped their wits.
How
was the play field different from the classroom? The participants were
the same, so it had to be their dynamics. On the field, twenty-two boys
were motivated, executing tiring maneuvers under unpleasant conditions,
but they demonstrated skill, scored to validate their effort, linked
effort to results, had team support, performed publicly, and practiced
to improve. A few simple guidelines unlocked the energy. Where, I
wondered, was the pocket rule book that told how to do the same in
classrooms? The skill we want to reveal is the expression of
learning. Imagine a student standing before his class, confident of
what he knows, and enthusiastically and expertly explaining it. He
practices to acquire skill, performs in public, and is acclaimed
successful.
Teachers
model this. What they do to teach is what students need to do in order
to learn. They obtain the knowledge in print, identify what s important
in it, organize it, get it in their head, and express it over and over.
As it becomes familiar, it affords them pleasure and creativity. They
entertain challenges to it, add to it, reflect on it, and re-organize
it. Students can’t do without any of those steps. They need the subject
printed, prioritized, organized, impressed in mind, expressed
repeatedly, added to, and modified. All the steps are critical at their
right moment but they also appear to make education more complicated.
One
feature of soccer I realized, unified its tasks as it does with every
sport, and simplified the classroom problem. In soccer, the whole
effort hinges around how increments of success are identified. The
soccer goal incorporates all the behaviors that lead up to it, so that
players always know where to aim their effort. We look for a similar
increment of effort that can organize classroom learning.
Both
national legislation and common experience identify it: to be able to
tell back what one has learned, usually by test-taking. Put
differently, mastery is the ability to explain something without help.
Remove help and ask a question. What students can answer is what they
know, and the boring principles above tell how. Because some ways of
applying them are deadening, we need to find ones instead that enable
students to be and feel constantly successful.
At
one level, how students learn is remarkably uniform. They take in a
piece and then bring it out to demonstrate that they have it. They own
that piece and then go for another. Absorbing and owning a point at a
time, the first day they may have “12" in the box on the board. The
next day they reclaim the prior day’s work so they don’t lose it, and
add more. Stated in terms of their effort, their education mainly
consists of accumulating pieces they can explain back. If every hour
you arrange for them to increase what they can explain, they steadily
expand their knowledge. Their score tells you where to direct their
energy next, and they know clearly where it has gotten them--two
understandings that help generate a successful class. Their increments
nailed and counted this way present validly what they're aware of
knowing, are measured the same by everyone, and need no comparison with
other students.
Of
the seven core elements of the Silver Bullet Easy Learning System, five
help to master knowledge, two create a positive atmosphere, and
fifty-four activities apply them.
Understand. Students understand what is conveyed or presented.
Organize. They organize it to make it easy to practice, save, and retrieve.
Practice. They assimilate knowledge by explaining and expressing it.
Score. They score their learning objectively by counting points of knowledge gained or timing their explanation.
Perform. They stand and perform what they know.
Good feelings. They give each other good feelings.
Communications. They improve the quality of their communications.
The
methods aren't separated by grade level because first graders can
become just as proficient at many of them as older students. Teachers
will readily understand what they can adapt to their students just by
practice. Overall, fresh energy steadily comes available from
understanding, organizing, talking, mental review, self-rating,
feedback, performing, scoring, communicating, and sharing good
feelings. Rather than focusing on the stresses that make students drop
out, we can make their classroom experience so successful and
satisfying that their determination to remain in school outweighs other
influences they put up with.
The title of the book is a response to the assertion that no single
factor could turn education around quickly. To the contrary, the effort
needed is commonplace, students' manner of learning isn't that
different one to another no matter what their prior knowledge or
disability, and the outcomes aren't hard to achieve. If we just arrange
for students actually to accumulate and save knowledge hour by hour,
this will shortly transform American education.
We begin in Chapter 1 with imagining a visit to a classroom that's
begun to use the design. Chapters 2-8 describe the methods in detail,
arranged in several categories. The first set offers nine "quick-start"
methods that comprise the basic structure for success and good
feelings. Chapters 3-4 show how to develop refined communications and
aid students' emotional self-management. Chapters 5-8 explain how to
practice learning to generate permanent retention, ways to think about
designing a curriculum and focusing student effort, how scoring instead
of grading can solve the problem of assessing student learning, and
ways students can demonstrate their learning that stimulate them to
invest greater energy in it. Chapter 9 narrates how a troubled class
applied the approach, Chapter 10 treats several issues about
implementation, and appendices and references conclude the book.
Depending on the context, my use of "we" may mean "you and I," "we
humans," or "those who work in classrooms." When able to choose between
terms in general use or those with specialized educational meaning, I
try to stay with the former if their meaning is clear. I sometimes use
boldface within paragraphs rather than section headings to emphasize
key ideas, and also to present a teacher's words for applying a method.
Sub-numbering within sections generally is to unify a set or sequence.
Parenthetical numbers preceded by cf. refer you to one of the
fifty-four methods, and my capitalization of a method within a
paragraph indicates that it's explained in more detail elsewhere.
To purchase the book in paperback/hardcover, please go to Xlibris.com or call Xlibris at 1- 888.795.4274 ext. 7479
To read the book introduction, CLICK HERE.
To download this book as an e-book, the cost is $6.95. Click the following button
Once you complete your payment with Paypal, click "Return to Merchant" to download our e-book there. |